Poll #2 Closed, Poll #3 Opened

The results of poll #2 are in. The question was "What is the optimal recertification period?". Twenty-four votes were cast. The results were:

• 1 year: 0 votes (0%)
• 2 years: 9 votes (37%)
• 3 years: 8 votes (33%)
• 4 years: 4 votes (16%)
• None, once certified always certified: 3 votes (12%)

So the majority seems to be in favor of the current recertification period.

Now for a new poll. This one concerns the recertification method. Realistically we have to expect recertification to cost money, so let's put that aside. What else should be required?

Currently a test is required for recertification. But other professions use different models. For instance, I'm a Professional Engineer in the state of Michigan. Recertification in Michigan requires only a fee. No testing is required. In other states there are requirements that a certain number of Continuing Education Units (CEUs) be earned during the certification period. CEUs are earned by taking classes, attending conferences, giving presentations at user group meetings, attending user group meetings, etc. Should CEUs be introduced into the LabVIEW certification system? For instance, perhaps CEUs could be used to waive the test. Earn enough CEUs and you don't take a recert test, but if you fall short you do take the test. Or perhaps CEUs should be required in addition to the test. Cast your vote in the poll and let me know what you think.